CO129-189 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [7-9] — Page 635

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last.

3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed.

However, to follow the exact instructions given and output in HTML with proper formatting based on the original text and rules provided, here is the revised output:

Called
for by any predecessor in his
despatch to Hong Kong
of the 32nd of October 1879,
you appear
to have misunderstood the
instructions contained
in that despatch, and
one important
particular - the
Ordinance is not
in accordance
with the
recommendations
contained in the
letter from
the Home
Office of
the 28th of
August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point
was not noticed in my despatch of the
29th of July last.

3. I
am unable to
approve of
this variation from the English Prison Act
unless there
are special reasons of which I have not
been informed.

Let's correct and simplify it according to the rules:

Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last.

3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed.

Output in HTML as requested:

Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last.

3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed.

Edit History

2026-05-22 00:10:21 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last. 3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed. However, to follow the exact instructions given and output in HTML with proper formatting based on the original text and rules provided, here is the revised output: Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last. 3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed. Let's correct and simplify it according to the rules: Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last. 3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed. Output in HTML as requested: Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to Hong Kong of the 32nd of October 1879, you appear to have misunderstood the instructions contained in that despatch, and one important particular - the Ordinance is not in accordance with the recommendations contained in the letter from the Home Office of the 28th of August 1879, nor with the law of England. I regret that this point was not noticed in my despatch of the 29th of July last. 3. I am unable to approve of this variation from the English Prison Act unless there are special reasons of which I have not been informed.
Baseline (Original)
Called for by any predecessor in his despatch to 134 1 he 32 of of October 1879, you appear to Love musunderstood the nistructions contamed in that despatch, and one important 6 particular the vig in depriving writing justices of the power of inflicting punishments for for the prison more serion's offences, the Ordinance is not in accordance the with recommendations. Contaméde 632 contamed in the the Home } letter frome Office of the 28th of August 1879, excloud any predecessor's despatch nor with the haw of England. I regret that this point bra not notured in my despatch tong of the 29th of July last. 3. I مجھ arr approve of unable to this variation from the English Prison ban unless there Але amy special reasons of which I have not been
2026-05-22 00:10:21 · Baseline
View content

Called

for by any predecessor in his

despatch to 134

1 he 32

of

of October 1879,

you appear

to Love

musunderstood the

nistructions contamed

in that despatch, and

one important

6 particular the

vig in depriving writing justices of the

power of inflicting punishments for

for the

prison

more serion's offences,

the Ordinance is not

in accordance

the

with

recommendations.

Contaméde

632

contamed in the

the Home

}

letter frome

Office of

the 28th of

August 1879, excloud

any predecessor's

despatch nor with the haw of England. I regret that this point

bra

not notured in my despatch tong of the

29th of July last.

3. I

مجھ

arr

approve of

unable to

this

variation from the English Prison ban

unless there

Але

amy

special reasons of which I have not

been

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.